Title:	Are dose-response relationships of resistance training reliable to improve functional performance in frail and pre-frail older adults? : a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials
Authors:	Nagata, Cristiane de Almeida Garcia, Patrícia Azevedo Hamu, Tânia Cristina Dias da Silva Caetano, Mônica Batista Duarte Costa, Rochelle Rocha Leal, Josevan Cerqueira Bastos, Júlia Aguillar Ivo Cadore, Eduardo Lusa Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti
metadata.dc.contributor.affiliation:	Universidade de Brasília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física Universidade de Brasília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação Universidade Estadual de Goiás, Laboratório de Pesquisa em Musculoesquelética Universidade de Brasília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Educação Física Universidade de Brasília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação Universidade de Brasília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Exercise Research Laboratory (LAPEX) Universidade de Brasília, Laboratory of Muscle and Tendon Plasticity, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física
Assunto::	Fragilidade Capacidade funcional Idosos Treinamento de força Envelhecimento
Issue Date:	27-Sep-2023
Publisher:	Elsevier B. V.
Citation:	NAGATA, Cristiane de Almeida et al. Are dose-response relationships of resistance training reliable to improve functional performance in frail and pre-frail older adults?: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Ageing Research Reviews, [S. l.], v. 91, 102079, nov. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2023.102079.
Abstract:	This systematic review with meta-analyses investigates the impact of resistance training (RT), using meta-regressions, on functional performance in frail and pre-frail adults aged ≥ 65 years to determine the key variables of RT. Ten randomized controlled trials involving 1303 participants were analyzed. Five studies assessed habitual walking speed (HWS), three studies evaluated performance in the timed-up-and-go test (TUG), three studies evaluated performance in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and three studies assessed performance in the sit-to-stand test (STS). RT alone improved STS time and SPPB scores in frail and pre-frail older adults. RT improved STS performance (Effect Size (ES):− 0.536; 95% CI − 0.874 to − 0.199; p = .002) and led to a 2.261-point increase in SPPB performance (ES:1.682; 95% CI 0.579–2.786; p = .003). At least two weekly training sessions are required to increase SPPB scores, and three sessions seem to optimize the improvements. Higher training volume per exercise and volume per session reduce the gains in SPPB performance. We did not observe any association between different doses of RT and STS time improvements. RT alone positively influenced TUG performance only in community-dwelling older frail and pre-frail adults but not in institutionalized older individuals. RT alone did not improve the HWS compared to the non-active control group.
metadata.dc.description.unidade:	Faculdade de Educação Física (FEF) Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde (FCTS) Curso de Fisioterapia (FCTS-FISIO)
metadata.dc.description.ppg:	Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação
DOI:	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2023.102079
metadata.dc.relation.publisherversion:	https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1568163723002386?via%3Dihub
Appears in Collections:	Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.