Titre:	Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in speech therapy rehabilitation of voice and swallowing function in adults-a systematic review
Auteur(s):	Silva, Milena Assis da Mangilli, Laura Davison
metadata.dc.identifier.orcid:	https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0042-8272 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2739-126X
Assunto::	Adolescentes Foniatria Deglutição Voz
Date de publication:	2021
Editeur:	John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Référence bibliographique:	SILVA, Milena Assis da; MANGILLI, Laura Davison. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in speech therapy rehabilitation of voice and swallowing function in adults—a systematic review. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, v.7, n. 6, p. 1131–1143, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.470. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34587375/. Acesso em: 28 dez. 2021.
Abstract:	Introduction: In recent years, a number of clinical trials have been published comparing transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and traditional speech therapy treatment of voice and swallowing functions, but results have been conflicting. Objective: Assess the methodological quality of studies and determine whether TENS is an efficient therapeutic strategy for speech therapy treatment of healthy adults or those with dysphonia and/or dysphagia. Methods: The databases used were Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MedLine), Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), Cochrane Library and Web of Science (ISI Web of Knowledge). The study was conducted between May 2018 and January 2019, in line with Cochrane Handbook guidelines, and included studies on the use of TENS in healthy adults or those with compromised voice and/or swallowing function. Results: After the search and extraction of studies, the following were identified: TENS + VOICE: 7 articles; TENS + SWALLOWING: 5 articles. The studies exhibited medium quality and are heterogeneous, making it difficult to determine their effectiveness and the parameters to be used in future research. There were no statistically significant differences between the use of TENS alone or associated with another therapeutic technique for voice. For swallowing function, one study proved better results in cases of associated techniques - TENS + traditional therapy. Discussion: Speech therapy should increase the number of studies published and improve their methodological quality, reassessing methodological criteria. Current clinical practice is not grounded in evidence-based science. CLINICAL MESSAGE: the studies analyzed exhibited medium methodological quality; there are variations in the time, number and periodicity of the therapeutic sessions for TENS; there were no statistically significant differences between the use of TENS alone or associated with another therapeutic technique in voice; there were statistically significant differences between the use of TENS associated with traditional therapeutic in swallowing function.
metadata.dc.description.unidade:	Faculdade UnB Ceilândia (FCE) Curso de Fonoaudiologia (FCE-FONO)
Licença::	© 2021 The Authors Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY).
DOI:	http://www.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.470
Collection(s) :	Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Tous les documents dans DSpace sont protégés par copyright, avec tous droits réservés.