Skip navigation
Universidade de Brasília
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/54455
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_FrequentistBayesianAnalysis.pdf2,45 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Dahan da Cunha-
dc.contributor.authorRolnick, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Isabella da Silva-
dc.contributor.authorCipriano Junior, Gerson-
dc.contributor.authorDurigan, João Luiz Quagliotti-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-25T12:48:03Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-25T12:48:03Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-
dc.identifier.citationNASCIMENTO, Dahan da Cunha et al. Frequentist, bayesian analysis and complementary statistical tools for geriatric and rehabilitation fields: are traditional null-hypothesis significance testing methods sufficient?. Clinical Interventions in Aging, [S. l.], v. 19, p. 277-287, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S441799. Disponível em: https://www.dovepress.com/frequentist-bayesian-analysis-and-complementary-statistical-tools-for--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CIA. Acesso em: 19 maio 2026.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/54455-
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherDovepresspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.titleFrequentist, bayesian analysis and complementary statistical tools for geriatric and rehabilitation fields : are traditional null-hypothesis significance testing methods sufficient?pt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordEstatísticapt_BR
dc.subject.keywordAnálise bayesianapt_BR
dc.subject.keywordFerramentas de estudopt_BR
dc.rights.license2024 Nascimento et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/ terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S441799pt_BR
dc.description.abstract1Null hypothesis significant testing (NHST) is the dominant statistical approach in the geriatric and rehabilitation fields. However, NHST is routinely misunderstood or misused. In this case, the findings from clinical trials would be taken as evidence of no effect, when in fact, a clinically relevant question may have a “non-significant” p-value. Conversely, findings are considered clinically relevant when significant differences are observed between groups. To assume that p-value is not an exclusive indicator of an association or the existence of an effect, researchers should be encouraged to report other statistical analysis approaches as Bayesian analysis and complementary statistical tools alongside the p-value (eg, effect size, confidence intervals, minimal clinically important difference, and magnitude-based inference) to improve interpretation of the findings of clinical trials by presenting a more efficient and comprehensive analysis. However, the focus on Bayesian analysis and secondary statistical analyses does not mean that NHST is less important. Only that, to observe a real intervention effect, researchers should use a combination of secondary statistical analyses in conjunction with NHST or Bayesian statistical analysis to reveal what p-values cannot show in the geriatric and rehabilitation studies (eg, the clinical importance of 1kg increase in handgrip strength in the intervention group of long-lived older adults compared to a control group). This paper provides potential insights for improving the interpretation of scientific data in rehabilitation and geriatric fields by utilizing Bayesian and secondary statistical analyses to better scrutinize the results of clinical trials where a p-value alone may not be appropriate to determine the efficacy of an intervention.pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6580-9404pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-2800pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6323-7003pt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Physical Education Departmentpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationLehman College, The Human Performance Mechanic Departmentpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Laboratory of Muscle and Tendon Plasticitypt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciencept_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Laboratory of Muscle and Tendon Plasticitypt_BR
dc.description.unidadeFaculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde (FCTS) – Campus UnB Ceilândiapt_BR
dc.description.ppgPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúdept_BR
dc.description.ppgPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitaçãopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.