http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/49049| Arquivo | Tamanho | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SofiaGuimaraesCarvalhoCampos_DISSERT.pdf | 1,35 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
| Título: | O aconselhamento de especialistas nas audiências públicas sobre a Lei Geral do Licenciamento Ambiental |
| Autor(es): | Campos, Sofia Guimarães Carvalho |
| Orientador(es): | Duarte, Tiago Ribeiro |
| Assunto: | Licenciamento ambiental Audiência pública Aconselhamento profissional |
| Data de publicação: | 18-Jul-2024 |
| Data de defesa: | 15-Fev-2023 |
| Referência: | CAMPOS, Sofia Guimarães Carvalho. O aconselhamento de especialistas nas audiências públicas sobre a lei geral do licenciamento ambiental. 2023. 123 f., il. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sociologia) — Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2023. |
| Abstract: | This dissertation analyzes the advice given by specialists in public hearings held to support decision-making on the general environmental licensing law, which took place in the Chamber of Deputies and the Federal Senate between 2019 and 2022. A systematic observation and discourse analysis of the 54 experts present at the 13 meetings held was carried out. In the light of the Social Studies of Science and Technology (ESCT), the objective of the research contemplates two important questions: first, to understand the discursive strategies used by the specialists in the construction of their role of authority and guarantee of credibility within the debates in the public hearings, which were called “credibility strategies”; and, second, to identify the frameworks and justifications given to the proposals under discussion, through the methodology of interpretive packages (Gamson, 1981; 1987), to understand values and representations in dispute. That said, the research sought to map the scenario of public hearings by describing the process of selecting experts and conducting meetings. In addition, the specialists were organized into sectors according to the institution to which they belong, with the intention of analyzing the similarities and differences between the sectors. In the end, all five sectors identified in the research mobilize the same credibility strategies, but distanced themselves in relation to the frameworks and positions around the bill. The results showed that there is a pattern in the use of credibility strategies by expert advice. They position themselves as “spokespersons” for the institutions, mobilize “credentials” and behave according to a “debate etiquette”, with the intention of building their authoritative role on the subject, demarcating what is considered valid or not and seeking that its recommendations are met. Also, the results show how the narratives of experts from different sectors are in a field of dispute, where some defend changes linked to the idea of economic development and modernization - connected to the interpretative packages of the Role of the State and Operational Feasibility -, while others have a vision focused on the preservation of the environment and social values – interpretative packages of the Rights of Traditional Peoples and Communities, Underestimation of Social Impacts and Role of the State. Thus, there are sectors that favor the economic or social or environmental sphere of environmental licensing to the detriment of others, depending on their values and representations of reality. Finally, it systematizes the speeches of the experts present in the debate on the new legal framework for environmental licensing in Brazil with the intention of registering what was in dispute within the process in which one of the greatest instruments of environmental management in Brazil may have been modified. Thus, it will be able to contribute, on the one hand, to future evaluations of modifications and innovations if the project is approved, and, on the other hand, to propose new paths, if the project is not approved. |
| Unidade Acadêmica: | Instituto de Ciências Sociais (ICS) Departamento de Sociologia (ICS SOL) |
| Informações adicionais: | Dissertação (mestrado) — Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Departamento de Sociologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia, 2023. |
| Programa de pós-graduação: | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia |
| Licença: | A concessão da licença deste item refere-se ao termo de autorização impresso assinado pelo autor com as seguintes condições: Na qualidade de titular dos direitos de autor da publicação, autorizo a Universidade de Brasília e o IBICT a disponibilizar por meio dos sites www.unb.br, www.ibict.br, www.ndltd.org sem ressarcimento dos direitos autorais, de acordo com a Lei nº 9610/98, o texto integral da obra supracitada, conforme permissões assinaladas, para fins de leitura, impressão e/ou download, a título de divulgação da produção científica brasileira, a partir desta data. |
| Agência financiadora: | Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). |
| Aparece nas coleções: | Teses, dissertações e produtos pós-doutorado |
Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.