Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/36584
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ARTIGO_CapacidadeRetencaoAgua.pdf1,04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Capacidade de retenção de água do dossel vegetativo : comparação entre Mata Atlântica e plantação florestal de eucalipto
Other Titles: Canopy water retention capacity : comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
Authors: Groppo, Juliano Daniel
Salemi, Luiz Felippe
Moraes, Jorge Marcos
Trevisan, Rodrigo
Seghesi, Gustavo Bicci
Martinelli, Luiz Antônio
metadata.dc.identifier.orcid: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-1632
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2271-5712
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7945-2381
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7540-0074
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7211-4459
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7103-7551
Assunto:: Solo - uso
Interceptação
Impacto
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Citation: GROPPO, Juliano Daniel et al. Capacidade de retenção de água do dossel vegetativo: comparação entre Mata Atlântica e plantação florestal de eucalipto. Ciência Florestal, v. 29, n. 1, p. 96-104, 2019. Disponível em: http://scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-50982019000100096. Acesso em: 23 jan.2020.
Abstract: The Atlantic rainforest is one of the most endangered ecosystems of our planet, this area presents only 8% of its original distribution, needs special attention to improve its conservation goals. This study aimed to compare the water retention capacity of the canopy in two watersheds an entirely covered by Atlantic Forest (Rain Forest), located in “Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar” and other covered with Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis in an adjacent area. Monitoring was carried out in the years of 2008 and 2009 through rain gauges and the water retention of the forest canopy was evaluated from linear regressions between precipitation (PR) and internal elevation (TR). The results showed that, with the exception of interception in the “dry” season that presented the lowest coefficients of determination (R2), being 77% in the eucalypt and 82% in the Atlantic Forest, the variables presented a good fit with the incident precipitation, with higher coefficients of 90%. The Atlantic Forest showed higher retention capacity of water in relation to Eucalyptus, where rainfall lower than 5 mm in the Atlantic Forest and 0.78mm in eucalypt are fully intercepted by the forest canopy and the wet period presented the greatest water retention capacity, probably due to the greater vegetation regeneration at this time, since in the dry period the leaves fall can decrease the retention.
Licença:: (CC BY-NC) - Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509816862
Appears in Collections:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Show full item record " class="statisticsLink btn btn-primary" href="/handle/10482/36584/statistics">



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.