Skip navigation
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/38304
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_AlternativeSanitizersParaformaldehyde.pdf101,32 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Gabriel da Silva-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Vinícius Machado dos-
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Sheila Tavares-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Jullyana C.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-26T20:57:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-26T20:57:23Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-
dc.identifier.citationOLIVEIRA, Gabriel da S. et al. Alternative sanitizers to paraformaldehyde for incubation of fertile eggs. Poultry Science, v. 99, n. 4, p. 2001-2006, abr. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.032. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119578294?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2020.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/38304-
dc.language.isoInglêspt_BR
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.pt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.titleAlternative sanitizers to paraformaldehyde for incubation of fertile eggspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordEssências e óleos essenciaispt_BR
dc.subject.keywordÓleo de cravopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordOvos - incubaçãopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordÁlcool de cereaispt_BR
dc.subject.keywordPrópolept_BR
dc.rights.license© 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.032pt_BR
dc.description.abstract1The aim of this study was to evaluate an ethanolic extract of propolis and clove essential oil as a substitute for paraformaldehyde for the sanitation of fertile eggs. In total, 1,800 hatching eggs (from 40-week-old CPK [Pesadão Vermelho] breeder hens) were randomly distributed among the treatments (grain alcohol, clove essential oil, ethanolic extract of propolis, and paraformaldehyde). Spraying was the application method for all treatments except for paraformaldehyde, for which fumigation was used. The experimental design was a randomized block design with 4 treatments. Analysis of the incubation parameters was based on 6 replications per treatment. The egg weight loss was lower in the eggs treated with ethanolic extract of propolis (8.59 ± 3.34%) than in the eggs treated with grain alcohol (13.40 ± 2.87%), clove essential oil (12.96 ± 3.33%), and paraformaldehyde (13.05 ± 3.24%). The hatchability of the fertile eggs (51.39 ± 5.81%) and the hatchability of the set eggs (44.74 ± 6.79%) were negatively affected by the application of ethanolic extract of propolis. Late mortality of eggs treated was higher than early mortality in the grain alcohol (12.14 ± 4.72%; 2.86 ± 3.30%), clove essential oil (4.60 ± 5.95%; 3.03 ± 3.50%), and ethanolic extract of propolis (36.63 ± 6.60%, 11.98 ± 4.30%) treatments. The eggs treated with clove essential oil (67.90 ± 1.87%), paraformaldehyde (67.80 ± 1.85%), or grain alcohol (67.50 ± 1.92%) presented chick yields as expected. However, due to the high yield of eggs treated with ethanolic extract of propolis (69.25 ± 1.68%), its application at the concentration used in the present research is not recommended. Clove essential oil, when sprayed on fertile eggs as a sanitizing agent, did not differ from paraformaldehyde in relation to hatchery performance parameters.pt_BR
dc.description.unidadeFaculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária (FAV)-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.