Skip navigation
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/36601
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_HereTodayGone.pdf679,93 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPalotti, Pedro Lucas de Mourapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCavalcante, Pedro Luiz Costapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Juliana Betini Fachinipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-24T10:32:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-24T10:32:15Z-
dc.date.issued2019pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationPALOTTI, Pedro Lucas de Moura; CAVALCANTE, Pedro Luiz Costa; GOMES, Juliana Betini Fachini. Here today, gone tomorrow: political ambition, coalitions, and accountability as determinants of ministerial turnover in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system. Brazilian Political Science Review, v. 13, n. 2, e0009, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201900020009. Disponível em: http://scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000200205. Acesso em: 23 jan. 2020.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/36601-
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherAssociação Brasileira de Ciência Políticapt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.titleHere today, gone tomorrow : political ambition, coalitions, and accountability as determinants of ministerial turnover in the Brazilian multiparty presidential systempt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordMinistros de Estadopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordPresidencialismopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordRotatividade de pessoalpt_BR
dc.subject.keywordPolítica - Brasilpt_BR
dc.rights.licenseThis publication is registered under a CC-BY Licence.-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201900020009pt_BR
dc.description.abstract1The article aims at understanding the determinants of ministerial turnover in presidential systems. There are essentially three key factors that govern the propensity for ministerial turnover in a presidential system: 01. political ambition - reflected in the individual or collective strategies and tactics employed by the party-affiliated actors represented in the cabinet; 02. the presence or absence of a governing coalition - which has bearing on the degree of ideological distance between the president and such political parties as form part of any governing coalition, with consequences for ministerial scrutiny; and 03. accountability - a determinant in responding to such external pressures as may be brought to bear by public opinion. In order to investigate the impacts of these factors, this inquiry seeks to analyze the new and dynamic democracy of Brazil. Brazil's presidential system presents interesting features that make it an excellent laboratory in which to test hypotheses concerning every aspect of ministerial turnover. To this end, this paper employs a multivariate methodology, as well as descriptive and survival analyses, based on a comprehensive and original database of cabinet ministers that draws on three presidencies over five democratically elected governments from 1995 to 2014. Among other results, our most original finding was that there is an inverse correlation between the degree of ministerial politicization (political ambition) and ideological distance from the president during political scandals (interaction between the governing coalition and accountability) on the one hand, and the length of ministerial tenure on the other.-
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-9726-
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7635-695X-
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6677-4768-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.