| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Corrêa, Leonardo Cambraia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pyrrho, Monique | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-11T14:49:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-11T14:49:25Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-07-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | CAMBRAIA, Leonardo; PYRRHO, Monique. Generative artificial intelligence and the risk of technodigital colonialism. Frontiers in Political Science, v. 7, 1628139, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1628139. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1628139/full. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2025. | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/52997 | - |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pt_BR |
| dc.publisher | Frontiers | pt_BR |
| dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | pt_BR |
| dc.title | Generative artificial intelligence and the risk of technodigital colonialism | pt_BR |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.keyword | Inteligência artificial | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.keyword | Inteligência artificial generativa | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.keyword | Ética digital | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.keyword | Decolonialidade | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.keyword | Plágio | pt_BR |
| dc.rights.license | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1628139 | pt_BR |
| dc.description.abstract1 | The use of Generative Artificial Intelligence has raised concerns related to plagiarism
in scientific contexts. However, bad academic writing is far from being the main
ethical challenge related to digital transformations in knowledge production.
Additionally, science is not the only trust discourse affected, as journalism and
law are deeply impacted in its social roles by the dissemination of artificially
generated discourses. Power and knowledge are increasingly imbricated in digital
society in a global context where colonial hierarchization, dehumanization and
exploitation strategies are still in place. In response to the insufficiency of highlevel
moral principles before the ethical and Human Rights challenges brought
by GenAI applications, this paper offers an alternative theoretical approach to
digital ethics presented in the “decolonizing ethical thinking” section. The aim is to
focus on the role that the new epistemic dynamics play to the risk of technodigital
colonialism. Decoloniality readings should account for why the benefits and risks
are not universally distributed and therefore may help ethical responses be more
attentive to the connections between knowledge and power. | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Brasilia, Bioethics Graduate Program | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Brasilia, Bioethics Graduate Program | pt_BR |
| dc.description.unidade | Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (IB) | pt_BR |
| dc.description.unidade | Departamento de Botânica (IB BOT) | pt_BR |
| dc.description.unidade | Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde (FS) | - |
| dc.description.ppg | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioética | pt_BR |
| Appears in Collections: | Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins
|
