Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/48639
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ARTIGO_EffectMelatoninOtoprotection.pdf1,79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAssumpção, Natália Lombardi-
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Juliana Gusmão de-
dc.contributor.authorSerra, Lucieny Silva Martins-
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Vanessa Veis-
dc.contributor.authorSampaio, Maria Luiza Queiroz-
dc.contributor.authorCaram, Andressa Alves-
dc.contributor.authorSampaio, André Luiz Lopes-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-09T16:52:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-09T16:52:01Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationASSUMPÇÃO, Natália Lombardi et al. Effect of melatonin on otoprotection in rodents: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, v. 89, n. 5, 101288, set./out. 2023.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/48639-
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevier Espana, S.L.U.pt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.titleEffect of melatonin on otoprotection in rodents: a systematic review with meta-analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordMelatoninapt_BR
dc.subject.keywordRoedorespt_BR
dc.subject.keywordAgentes ototóxicospt_BR
dc.subject.keywordOtoproteçãopt_BR
dc.rights.licenseThis is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).pt_BR
dc.description.abstract1Objectives: To determinate the otoprotective efficacy of melatonin.in experimental models of rodents through a systematic review of the literature. Methods: Altogether, 154 articles were found in four databases. The PICOS strategy (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) was used to define the eligibility criteria. Studies that met the inclusion criteria for the second step were included in a qualitative synthesis. Each study type was analyzed with the CAMARADES quality of assessment’s checklist end the SYRCLE RoBS risk of bias. Results: Seven articles were selected, and four were included in the meta-analysis. It was possible to obtain seven outcomes according to the standard auditory frequencies presented among the studies, considering a minimum of three standard frequencies. The outcomes analyzed were for the frequencies of 1500, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, and 8000 Hz.pt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Pesquisa em Otorrinolaringologiapt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Pesquisa em Otorrinolaringologiapt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Pesquisa em Otorrinolaringologiapt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Departamento de Fonoaudiologiapt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Pesquisa em Otorrinolaringologiapt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Pesquisa em Otorrinolaringologiapt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Pesquisa em Otorrinolaringologiapt_BR
dc.description.unidadeFaculdade de Medicina (FM)pt_BR
dc.description.unidadeFaculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde (FCTS) – Campus UnB Ceilândiapt_BR
dc.description.unidadeCurso de Fonoaudiologia (FCTS-FONO)pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Show simple item record " class="statisticsLink btn btn-primary" href="/handle/10482/48639/statistics">



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.