Skip navigation
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/40490
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_ComparativeAssessmentMortality.pdf426,9 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Título: Comparative assessment of mortality risk factors between admission and follow-up models among patients hospitalized with COVID-19
Autor(es): Lazar Neto, Fellipe
Salzstein, Guilherme A.
Cortez, André L.
Bastos, Thaís L.
Baptista, Fabíola V. D.
Moreira, Joanne A.
Lauterbach, Gerhard P.
Oliveira, Julio Cesar de
Assis, Fábio Cavalcante
Aguiar, Marília R. A.
Deus, Aline A. de
Dias, Marcos Felipe D. S.
Sousa, Felipe C. B.
Duailibi, Daniel F.
Kondo, Rodrigo H.
Moraes, Augusto César F. de
Martins, Milton A.
Assunto: Covid-19 - Brasil
Doentes hospitalizados
Fatores de risco
Mortalidade
Data de publicação: 9-Mar-2021
Editora: Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases
Referência: LAZAR NETO, Fellipe et al. Comparative assessment of mortality risk factors between admission and follow-up models among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, v. 105, p. 723-729, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.013. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221002307. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2021.
Abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to compare differences in mortality risk factors between admission andfollow-up incorporated models.Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 524 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection admitted to atertiary medical center in São Paulo, Brazil from 13 March to 30 April 2020. Data were collected onadmission, and the third, eighth and fourteenth days of hospitalization. The hazard ratio (HR) wascalculated and 28-day in-hospital mortality risk factors were compared between admission and follow-up models using a time-dependent Cox regression model.Results: Of 524 patients, 50.4% needed mechanical ventilation. The 28-day mortality rate was 32.8%.Compared with follow-up, admission models under-estimated the mortality HR for peripheral oxygensaturation <92% (1.21 versus 2.09), heart rate >100 bpm (1.19 versus 2.04), respiratory rate >24/min (1.01versus 1.82) and mechanical ventilation (1.92 versus 12.93). Low oxygen saturation, higher oxygensupport and more biomarkers–including lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and urea remained associated with mortality after adjustment for clinical factorsat follow-up compared with only urea and oxygen support at admission.Conclusions: The inclusion of follow-up measurements changed mortality hazards of clinical signs andbiomarkers. Low oxygen saturation, higher oxygen support, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein,neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and urea could help with prognosis of patients during follow-up.
Unidade Acadêmica: Faculdade de Medicina (FMD)
Licença: © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-NDlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.013
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins
UnB - Covid-19

Mostrar registro completo do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.